Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.10.11: Planned for the 28th of Feb, 2018

[Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 01/30/2018 02:14 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As release 3.10.10 is tagged and off to packaging, here are the needed
> details for 3.10.11
>
> Release date: 28th Feb, 2018

Checking the 3.10 review backlog, here are a couple of concerns,

1) Reviews,
  - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19081/
  - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19082/

Have been submitted since Jan 9th, but are not passing regressions or
smoke. I rebased them again today, but they still fail.

@Du, can you look at these, as you have backported them.

2) @Hari, https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19553/ seems to be failing
consistently in the test, ./tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t please take a
look, as this patch is important from an upgrade perspective.

atin@dhcp35-96:~/codebase/upstream/glusterfs_master/glusterfs$ git log tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t
commit 858fae39936e5aee5ea4e3816a10ba310d04cf61
Author: Amar Tumballi <amarts@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Mon Nov 27 23:56:50 2017 +0530

    tests: mark currently failing regression tests as known issues
   
    Change-Id: If6c36dc6c395730dfb17b5b4df6f24629d904926
    BUG: 1517961
    Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts@xxxxxxxxxx>

FWIW, this test is marked as bad in master.  Should we mark it bad in release-3.12 as well?

> Tracker bug for blockers:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.10.11
>
> Shyam
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

>
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel