On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:04:48AM +0100, Csaba Henk wrote: > Hello list, > > here is an overview of recent additions to the > FUSE protocol that are not yet supported by > the GlusterFS FUSE implementation and > what sh/could be done about them. > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGxMC7Db7Rdd19VXlBe0tI-frdjICJdzxx4EsntuPDU/edit > > Comments on the doc or in this thread are most > warmly welcome. I would really love to see us use libfuse (not a forked or bundled version) with libgfapi. That should make it easier for us to follow upstream enhancements. A proof of concept was once written by Olegsandr Natalenko and is available at https://github.com/gluster/xglfs Maintaining three access xlators/protocols (FUSE, gNFS, gfapi) adds a lot of overhead. Having a single one (gfapi) with additional projects for the other 'bindings' to protocols would be much better to maintain. There was a bug or issue for this somewhere... I'm not able to find it though. Niels _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
