On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Nigel Babu <nigelb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Landed:https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/commit/ c3d7974e2be68f0fac8f54c9557d0f 868e6be6c8
Please rebase your patches and re-trigger.
Thanks Nigel. I am wondering how did the build for #18681 succeed? Any insights on this?
--On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Nigel Babu <nigelb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Rafi has a fix[1]. I'm going to make it skip regressions and land it directly.--On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Please check [1].
Build on master branch on my laptop failed too:
[raghu@unused server]$ make > /dev/null
server.c: In function 'init':
server.c:1205:9: error: too few arguments to function 'rpcsvc_program_register'
In file included from server.h:17:0,
from server.c:16:
../../../../rpc/rpc-lib/src/rpcsvc.h:426:1: note: declared here
make[1]: *** [server.lo] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
The change was introduced by [2]. However, the puzzling thing is [2] itself was built successfully and has passed all tests. Wondering how did that happen.
[1] https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/7281/consol e
[2] review.gluster.org/18681
regards,
Raghavendra
nigelbnigelb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
Raghavendra G
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
