Re: Identifying tests to automate with Glusto

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 at 19:32, Nigel Babu <nigelb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello folks,

One of the action items of the Testing BoF around Glusto is to start a discussion on the mailing list about specific scenarios that aren't covered in our existing .t tests that need a proper cluster to test. I know Nithya had one about rebalance where we don't have enough coverage with the .t framework. If anyone else has similar scenarios or just tests they want written in Glusto, please speak up.

One of the missing part with existing .t tests in glusterd is the client and server compatibility with different op-versions. Off late we have seen most of the bugs. I think we’d need to write tests with clients running with different versions, heterogeneous servers ( in n to n-2 range for both client and server) and ofcourse the upgrade tests.




Kartik (CC'd) is interested in helping us write new tests.

--
nigelb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
--Atin
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux