Re: [Qusetions] How profile affect glusterfs performance?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What is your usecase if I may ask?

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Xie Changlong <xiechanglong.d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
在 6/5/2017 1:22 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri 写道:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Xie Changlong <xiechanglong.d@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

在 6/5/2017 10:50 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri 写道:

I think there have been improvements here to use special instructions to


if "special instructions" means profile command or more? Also can you
point which commit?


I meant Intel CPU extentions
You should look at
http://review.gluster.org/12209
http://review.gluster.org/12210
https://review.gluster.org/16963
https://review.gluster.org/17009

Useful enough for me, thanks for your patience.



do the increments instead of taking spin-locks and doing increments. So
may be it doesn't affect performance as much anymore. I think if you don't
see a difference, then the enhancements are doing a good job :-).

Which version of gluster are you using?


Our version is gluster 3.8.4

--
Thanks
     -Xie





--
Thanks
    -Xie



--
Pranith
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux