Re: [Qusetions] How profile affect glusterfs performance?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Xie Changlong <xiechanglong.d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
在 6/5/2017 10:50 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri 写道:
I think there have been improvements here to use special instructions to

if "special instructions" means profile command or more? Also can you point which commit?

I meant Intel CPU extentions
You should look at
http://review.gluster.org/12209
http://review.gluster.org/12210
https://review.gluster.org/16963
https://review.gluster.org/17009


do the increments instead of taking spin-locks and doing increments. So may be it doesn't affect performance as much anymore. I think if you don't see a difference, then the enhancements are doing a good job :-).

Which version of gluster are you using?

Our version is gluster 3.8.4

--
Thanks
    -Xie



--
Pranith
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux