All patches which are more than 60days old: https://hackmd.io/GYIwhsEMYOwLQGYAMBOATHALCmm4oEZgBTOGYgVgA5qxiqqY0g==#
AFR patches : https://hackmd.io/BwTgbARgTAJmDMBaeVgDNEBYzAIaJFxhgPELRHlwHYBGMIA=On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
AmarLet me know if anyone wants CSV output of the pending patches, and what all the info they need?Did get hold of all the pending patches till 2017-05-20 (660 in total). Note that it includes "All open" patches.Attached is the file with all the details. Nigel, considering we have dump to have reference, can we go ahead and close everything which is 79 days old?I recommend all the maintainers to go through the list and make sure they take appropriate action on all old patches. If people are lazy to go through all the patches, i can provide list of files changed per patch (url), so you can choose what matters to you.Regards,--On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Shyam <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 03/17/2017 03:22 AM, Nigel Babu wrote:
Hello folks,
I put this up for discussion at the last community meeting, but I was unable to
attend the meeting. We have a lot of reviews that are quite old[1]. They have,
at some point, become unmergable or the person who proposed them lost interest.
This is on us. We've let reviews slip through the cracks. There are also the
odd cases when a second patch has been merged which fixes the actual issue, but
the old one isn't abandoned.
There's no way we can work our way through the entire list. I suggest that we
abandon all patches with no updates in the last 90 days. If it hits on a patch
that someone is particularly passionate to get merged in, they're welcome to
re-open it.
I agree with this, also it makes the dashboard more manageable.
A. Current master dashboard: https://review.gluster.org/#/projects/glusterfs,dashboards/d ashboard:master-dashboard
B. Master dashboard (older than 90 days): http://bit.ly/2m8FX6m
C. Master dashboard (only patches newer than 90 days): http://bit.ly/2mB0xsl
If we abandon older patches, our master dashboard will look like (C) above.
This means that there's already patches that are quite a few reviews that need
some hand holding. Is it possible for us to catch up to the ones that are
currently pending?
We should focus on getting things out of the way at least in 90 days, one way or the other. So, I would assume as we start using the dashboard, we will have better focus on the "Awaiting Reviews Or Regression" section as we go bottom up on that.
So I would say we can catch up here (as in C), but not with B, so the overall idea seems to be useful to reduce noise at first, and possibly never get into this problem in the future as we catch up.
______________________________
[1]: http://bit.ly/2nfBq1N
--
nigelb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
--
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
