On 02/16/2017 07:23 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
It's *primarily* a test tool. It could also be useful to sysadmins IMO,
hence its inclusion, but I guess I could live with it being left out.
Oh! we can add it no problem, I thought it was a left over by accident.
It might make more sense for gf_attach to be packaged as part of
glusterfs-server, since it communicates with server processes. Would
that help at all? It probably still requires some specfile changes,
but shouldn't introduce a new dependency since lots of server stuff
already depends on GFAPI.
Yup, glusterfs-server already has this dependency, so we can add it to that.
I filed this [1] bug Jeff, in case you get to it first, fine, else one
of us will pick up the fix.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423063
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
