> On an upgrade test, when upgrading clients, glusterfs-fuse RPM now > needed libgfapi, this is due to gf_attach being packaged as a part of > glusterfs-fuse. > > Jeff, we do not need to package gf_attach, right? This is a test tool, > if I am correct. It's *primarily* a test tool. It could also be useful to sysadmins IMO, hence its inclusion, but I guess I could live with it being left out. > Niels, you did add this to .gitignore Samikshan did. > but looks like it is getting > packaged into the glusterfs-fuse RPM, guess the Makefile needs some > modifications for this to be ignored? > > It is built from here: ./glusterfsd/src/Makefile.am > > Let me know if this is the case, I can file a bug and we can take this > forward. It might make more sense for gf_attach to be packaged as part of glusterfs-server, since it communicates with server processes. Would that help at all? It probably still requires some specfile changes, but shouldn't introduce a new dependency since lots of server stuff already depends on GFAPI. _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
