Re: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure

[Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Raised https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405301 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405305 for master and release-3.9 respectively.

I've sent patches to move this test under the bad tests category until Niels' patch fixes the crash.

This is to prevent the two patches on which the test is failing and another crash fix that cannot be

merged until these two patches are, from being blocked.

-Krutika

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Anoop C S <anoopcs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 04:10 -0500, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:
>
> Oh ok. I see that in ./tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.c the function glfs_upcall_get_reason() is
> causing segmentation fault, as per the stderr messages.

Another recent failure in master branch:
https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2168/console

> Adding Niels, if he wants to take a look at this.
>
> We can mark the test bad by raising a Bz i suppose.
>
> Thanks,
> Poornima
>
> From: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" <pgurusid@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Soumya Koduri" <skoduri@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Pranith Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 1:49:27 AM
> Subject: Re: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure
>
> No unfortunately I had no success with recreating the failure either on my setup or on a borrowed
> centos from jenkins cluster.
>
> Ok this is good information. I didn't know it had failed on other patches too. I thought it's only
> with my patch.
> Can this be marked as a bad test in that case?
>
> -Krutika
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah <pgurusid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are you able consistently reproduce this on your local system as well? If so can you share the
> > system?
> > I see that it has failed for many other patches as well. http://fstat.gluster.org/weeks/1/failur
> > e/34
> >
> > Regards,
> > Poornima
> > From: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" <pgurusid@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Soumya Koduri" <skoduri@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Pranith Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 8:47:57 AM
> > Subject: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The test tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.t seems to be failing consistently on my 3.9 backport http
> > ://review.gluster.org/#/c/16046/
> >
> > The patch itself makes changes only in compound fops, so it is unlikely that the failure is
> > caused by the patch itself.
> >
> > Here's a sample failure run: https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2134/console
> >
> > I ran the test on my laptop and it passes consistently.
> > I ran the test on a borrowed centos slave and it passes there as well.
> > I looked at the logfile bug1291259.log from the archived build failure logs
> > but there are no failures.
> >
> > If you have any ideas on how to proceed further, could you please suggest the same?
> >
> > -Krutika
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel