On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 04:10 -0500, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: > > Oh ok. I see that in ./tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.c the function glfs_upcall_get_reason() is > causing segmentation fault, as per the stderr messages. Another recent failure in master branch: https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2168/console > Adding Niels, if he wants to take a look at this. > > We can mark the test bad by raising a Bz i suppose. > > Thanks, > Poornima > > From: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" <pgurusid@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Soumya Koduri" <skoduri@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Pranith Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 1:49:27 AM > Subject: Re: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure > > No unfortunately I had no success with recreating the failure either on my setup or on a borrowed > centos from jenkins cluster. > > Ok this is good information. I didn't know it had failed on other patches too. I thought it's only > with my patch. > Can this be marked as a bad test in that case? > > -Krutika > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah <pgurusid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Are you able consistently reproduce this on your local system as well? If so can you share the > > system? > > I see that it has failed for many other patches as well. http://fstat.gluster.org/weeks/1/failur > > e/34 > > > > Regards, > > Poornima > > From: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" <pgurusid@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Soumya Koduri" <skoduri@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: "Pranith Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 8:47:57 AM > > Subject: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure > > > > > > Hi, > > > > The test tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.t seems to be failing consistently on my 3.9 backport http > > ://review.gluster.org/#/c/16046/ > > > > The patch itself makes changes only in compound fops, so it is unlikely that the failure is > > caused by the patch itself. > > > > Here's a sample failure run: https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2134/console > > > > I ran the test on my laptop and it passes consistently. > > I ran the test on a borrowed centos slave and it passes there as well. > > I looked at the logfile bug1291259.log from the archived build failure logs > > but there are no failures. > > > > If you have any ideas on how to proceed further, could you please suggest the same? > > > > -Krutika > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
