Re: Custom Transport layers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hmmm, I never considered that side of things. I guess I had a somewhat
> naive vision of packets floating through the ethernet visible to all
> interfaces, but switched based networks are basically a star topology.
> Are you saying the switch would likely be the choke point here?

Not necessarily.  Switches can do this fan-out more efficiently than
any general-purpose machine could, so they're not going to get choked
up, but the benefit's not that great either.  The fact that one send
from the client can consume resources on N server-side channels can
also exacerbate problems like TCP incast collapse (in much the same
way that similar "amplification" is the basis for many DoS attacks).
Broadcast/multicast can still be useful for many things, but IMO not
those that are both throughput- and latency-sensitive like we are.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux