On Saturday 27 August 2016, Prasanna Kalever <pkalever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here is the patch that should fix it
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15331/
Thanks! Well thats an easy way, but the question here is dont we need the parent patch to be merged to ensure there is no other functionality broken. Currently I see that the parent patch has a -1, in that case is it required to revert 15225?
Happy weekend!
--
Prasanna
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [1] has broken mainline compilation and I feel this could be because its
> parent patch is not been merged otherwise smoke should have caught it.
> Please resolve it at earliest.
>
> [1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15225/
>
>
> --Atin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
--Atin
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
