Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Glusterfs-3.7.13 release plans

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:46:57PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Kaushal M <kshlmster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'm (or was) planning to do a 3.7.13 release on schedule today. 3.7.12
> >> has a huge issue with libgfapi, solved by [1].
> >> I'm not sure if this fixes the other issues with libgfapi noticed by
> >> Lindsay on gluster-users.
> >>
> >> This patch has been included in the packages 3.7.12 built for CentOS,
> >> Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian and SUSE. I guess Lindsay is using one of these
> >> packages, so it might be that the issue seen is new. So I'd like to do
> >> a quick release once we have a fix.
> >>
> >
> >  http://review.gluster.org/14835 probably is the one you are looking for.
> >
> >
> 
> Ignore it. I had a chance to talk to Poornima and she mentioned that this
> is a different problem.

The patch that fixes the problem is http://review.gluster.org/14822 and
I've merged it yesterday. The problem was introduced by
http://review.gluster.org/14822 (similar subject as 12835 above).
Unfortunately none of the libgfapi maintainer did completely review the
change before it got merged. It also seems that minimal testing was done
after the change got included (last minute change in 3.8, quickly
backported as well).

In order to make Gluster more stable, and prevent problems like this
again, we really need to work on automating test cases. I hope all
maintainers are thinking about how they want to test the components they
are responsible for. For example, I'm planning to run the upstream QEMU
tests against our nightly builds (libgfapi), and similar for the
connectathon tests (Gluster/NFS). At one point it should be possible to
wrap these in DiSTAF, but the DiSTAF job in the CentOS CI is not ready
yet.

Thanks,
Niels


> 
> 
> >
> >> Maintainers can merge changes into release-3.7 that follow the
> >> criteria given in [2]. Please make sure to add the bugs for patches
> >> you are merging are added as dependencies for the 3.7.13 tracker bug
> >> [3].
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Kaushal
> >>
> >> [1]: https://review.gluster.org/14822
> >> [2]: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/glusterfs-release-process-201606
> >> under the GlusterFS minor release heading
> >> [3]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.7.13
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> maintainers mailing list
> >> maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >>
> >
> >

> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux