|
Speaking as a user, not a dev, there have been a lot of memory
leak fixes in 3.7. I have no idea how many of those were
backported to 3.6. It might be worth testing 3.7.11 to compare.
On 05/26/2016 08:02 AM, Kremmyda,
Olympia (Nokia - GR/Athens) wrote:
Hi,
We use Gluster 3.6.9 in one replicated volume (named
“log”), with two bricks.
Our tests include Nested Directory Creation operations
(Creation from 1000 up to 250000 Directory Trees) with 396
depth and no deletion is performed.
We have observed the following memory usage statistics
shown in the images:
and we would like your opinion if this memory usage is
normal for glusterfs.
Also after our tests, we delete these directories and the
memory is not released.
Can you describe us the expected memory behaviour in
these cases?
Thank you,
Olia
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
|
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
