Re: [Gluster-users] changes to client port range in release 3.1.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Prasanna Kalever <pkalever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If we see the ephemeral port standards
> 1.  The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) suggests the range
> 49152 to 65535
> 2.  Many Linux kernels use the port range 32768 to 61000
> more at [2]
>
> Some of our thoughts include split the current brick port range ( ~16K
> ) into two (may be ~8K each or some other ratio) and use them for
> client and bricks, which could solve the problem but also  introduce a
>  limitation for scalability.
>

I would recommend providing the administrator an ability to override
any logic that we use to implement this behavior.

> The patch [1] goes in 3.1.3, we wanted know if there are any impacts
> caused with these changes.
>
>
> [1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13998/


I would have ideally liked the patch to have spent some time in the
review queue after this email was sent. It does look like the patch
got merged within 2 hours after the email was sent. This interval is
grossly inadequate if you are looking to obtain any feedback that can
add value. Nevertheless I have provided my comments on the patchset.
Please incorporate them in a subsequent commit.

Regards,
Vijay
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux