Manikandan Selvaganesh <mselvaga@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > #0 0xbb4104b7 in ?? () > (gdb) bt > #0 0xbb4104b7 in ?? () > #1 0xbb410458 in ?? () > #2 0x00000004 in ?? () > #3 0x00000006 in ?? () > #4 0xbb457084 in ?? () > #5 0xbb759119 in synctask_destroy (task=0xb8a18030) at In my opinion there is no particular reason it should be related to synctask: the stack is obviously corupted (0x00000004 is certainly wrong), and we cannot trust what is below. I do not say it cannot be in synctask, but it could be anywhere. Do you have any hint about where the thread last executed known code? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
