Bitrot Review Request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Pranith,

You had a concern of consuming I/O threads when bit-rot uses rchecksum interface to
signing, normal scrubbing and on-demand scrubbing with tiering. 
 
      http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13833/5/xlators/storage/posix/src/posix.c

As discussed over comments, the concern is valid and the above patch is not being
taken in and would be abandoned.

I have the following patch where the signing and normal scrubbing would not
consume io-threads. Only the on-demand scrubbing consumes io-threads. I think
this should be fine as tiering is single threaded and only consumes
one I/O thread (as told by Joseph on PatchSet 6).

      http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13969/

Since, on-demand scrubbing is disabled by default and there is a size cap and
we document to increase the default number of I/O threads, consuming one I/O
thread for scrubbing would be fine I guess.

Let me know your thoughts.

Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux