Re: Readdir plus implementation in tier xlator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:16:48AM +0530, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote:
...
> >> But the problem comes when we use gf_api, where we don't have any
> >> control over client behavior. So to fix this issue we have to give stat
> >> information for all the entries.
> >>
> > Apart from Samba, what other consumers of gfapi have this problem?
> 
> In nfs-ganesha, What I understand is, they are not sending readdirp. So
> there we are good. But any other app which always expect a valid
> response from readdirp will fail.

glusterfs-coreutils uses glfs_readdirplus() too. I do not know if it is
a problem there, but you should be able to check that pretty easily.

I do not know what other libgfapi applications do, and I've not seen the
sources of all of the applications in any case.

Niels

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux