On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 13:25 +0530, Anoop C S wrote: > On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 01:21 +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > > Regression run [1] failed from trash.t, however the same doesn't > > talk > > about any core file, but when I run it with and with out my changes > > the same generates a core. > on which platform you ran trash.t, NetBSD or Linux? > > > > > > > [1] > > https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggere > > d/ > > 15971/consoleFull > > > not ok 62 , LINENUM:245 > FAILED COMMAND: start_vol patchy /mnt/glusterfs/0 > /mnt/glusterfs/0/abc > > start_vol function basically performs volume start command and > repeatedly checks for the presence of directory named 'abc' under > root > of the volume. I see the following glusterd errors from archived > logs(build-install-etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log): > > > > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.722283] W [common- > > utils.c:1805:gf_string2boolean] (-->0xb9c31f47 > > <glusterd_op_start_volume+0x3f4> at > > /build/install/lib/glusterfs/3.8dev/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so -- > > > > > > 0xbb733b56 <gf_string2boolean+0x77> at > > /build/install/lib/libglusterfs.so.0 ) 0-management: argument > > invalid > > [Invalid argument] > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.766453] I [MSGID: 106144] [glusterd- > > pmap.c:270:pmap_registry_remove] 0-pmap: removing brick > > /d/backends/patchy11 on port 49153 > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.771041] E [MSGID: 106005] [glusterd- > > utils.c:4689:glusterd_brick_start] 0-management: Unable to start > > brick nbslave75.cloud.gluster.org:/d/backends/patchy1 > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.771132] E [MSGID: 106123] [glusterd- > > mgmt.c:306:gd_mgmt_v3_commit_fn] 0-management: Volume start commit > > failed. > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.771161] E [MSGID: 106123] [glusterd- > > mgmt.c:1423:glusterd_mgmt_v3_commit] 0-management: Commit failed > > for > > operation Start on local node > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.771188] E [MSGID: 106123] [glusterd- > > mgmt.c:2014:glusterd_mgmt_v3_initiate_all_phases] 0-management: > > Commit Op Failed > Brick errors from bricks/d-backends-patchy1.log: > > > > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.763066] I > > [rpcsvc.c:2218:rpcsvc_set_outstanding_rpc_limit] 0-rpc-service: > > Configured rpc.outstanding-rpc-limit with value 64 > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.763127] W [MSGID: 101002] > > [options.c:954:xl_opt_validate] 0-patchy-server: option 'listen- > > port' > > is deprecated, preferred is 'transport.socket.listen-port', > > continuing with correction > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.763273] E [socket.c:765:__socket_server_bind] > > 0- > > tcp.patchy-server: binding to failed: Address already in use > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.763293] E [socket.c:768:__socket_server_bind] > > 0- > > tcp.patchy-server: Port is already in use > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.763314] W > > [rpcsvc.c:1600:rpcsvc_transport_create] 0-rpc-service: listening on > > transport failed > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.763332] W [MSGID: 115045] [server.c:1061:init] > > 0-patchy-server: creation of listener failed > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.763351] E [MSGID: 101019] > > [xlator.c:430:xlator_init] 0-patchy-server: Initialization of > > volume > > 'patchy-server' failed, review your volfile again > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.763368] E [MSGID: 101066] > > [graph.c:324:glusterfs_graph_init] 0-patchy-server: initializing > > translator failed > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.763383] E [MSGID: 101176] > > [graph.c:670:glusterfs_graph_activate] 0-graph: init failed > > [2016-04-19 15:56:48.766235] W [glusterfsd.c:1265:cleanup_and_exit] > > (-->0x8050b83 <glusterfs_process_volfp+0x1a3> at > > /build/install/sbin/glusterfsd -->0x804e8e7 <cleanup_and_exit+0x8d> > > at /build/install/sbin/glusterfsd ) 0-: received signum (0), > > shutting > > down I found the following BZ with exactly similar brick error messages. Can you please confirm whether they are related or not? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322805 > Is this something related to the > patch(http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10 > 785/) for which the this regression was run against? Because I don't > expect volume start to fail. > > If you have the coredump, can you please share the back trace for > further analysis? > > Thanks, > --Anoop C S. > > > > > ~Atin > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
