Re: Report ESTALE as ENOENT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Yes. I think the caching example mentioned by Shyam is a good example of ESTALE error. Also User Serviceable Snapshots (USS) relies heavily on ESTALE errors. Because the files/directories from the snapshots are assigned a virtual gfid on the fly when being looked up. If those inodes are purged out of the inode table due to lru list becoming full, then a access to that gfid from the client, will make snapview-server send ESTALE and either fuse (I think our fuse xlator does a revalidate upon getting ESTALE) or NFS client can revalidate via path based resolution.

Regards,
Raghavendra


On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Shyam <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/23/2016 12:07 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
On 03/23/2016 09:16 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote:
If it occurs only when the file/dir is not actually present at the
back-end, shouldn't we fix the server to send ENOENT then?
I never fully understood it here is the answer:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/6318/

The intention of ESTALE is to state that the inode#/GFID is stale, when using that for any operations. IOW, we did not find the GFID in the backend, that does not mean the name is not present. This hence means, if you have a pGFID+bname, try resolving with that.

For example, a client side cache can hang onto a GFID for a bname, but another client could have, in the interim, unlinked the bname and create a new file there.

A presence test using GFID by the client that cached the result the first time, is an ESTALE. But a resolution based on pGFID+bname again by the same client would be a success.

By extension, a GFID based resolution, when not really present in the backend will return ESTALE, it could very well mean ENOENT, but that has to be determined by the client again, if possible.

See "A10. What does it mean when my application fails because of an ESTALE error?" for NFS here [1] and [2] (there maybe better sources for this information)

[1] http://nfs.sourceforge.net/
[2] https://lwn.net/Articles/272684/



_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux