Hi all, rm has a different behavior for ESTALE when compared to ENOENT. So, we shouldn't be reporting ENOENT errors as ESTALE. I've a fix for fuse [1]. Similar fix is necessary for NFS and gfapi (samba too?). Also, reviews on [1] is much appreciated as this patch unconditionally converts all ESTALE to ENOENT, which might not be correct behavior always. Sometimes ESTALE might be a valid errno. If you point me when it is necessary to report ESTALE errors unchanged, I'll accommodate the comments in the patch. @Soumya/Poornima/Raghavendra, Is it possible to send an analogous patch to NFS and gfapi? [1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13816/ regards, Raghavendra _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
