On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:10:40AM -0500, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: > On 02/13/2016 08:37 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Kaushal M <kshlmster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:41 PM, André Bauer <abauer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Already asked myself why this not exists. > >>> > >>> so... +1 from me. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> André > >>> > >>> Am 04.02.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Niels de Vos: > >>>> > >>>> How about a project to write a fuse client based on libgfapi and > >>>> libfuse instead? That would reduce the need for our fuse-bridge > >>>> over time. libgfapi should be ready for this, Samba, NFS-Ganesha > >>>> and others already use it heavily. > >>>> > >> > >> +1 from me too. But we need a mentor for this. Neils would you be a > >> willing mentor? > > > > If this is the only project idea which exists, the application > > organization for GSoC would be somewhat weak. Organizations are > > usually expected to come up with a number (more than one) of ideas > > which are also attached with (at least) one mentor. More at > > <https://flossmanuals.net/GSoCMentoring/making-your-ideas-page/> (as a > > manner of guidance) > > How about a gfapi-based bash shell. glusterfs-coreutils actually does this already. If features are missing, you can report them in the GitHub project: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-coreutils/issues Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
