Re: regarding GF_CONTENT_KEY and dht2 - perf with small files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Even with compound fops It will still require two sequential network
> operations from dht2. One to MDC and one to DC So I don't think it helps.

There are still two hops, but making it a compound op keeps the
server-to-server communication in the compounding translator (which
should already be able to handle that case) instead of having to put it
in the MDS.  It's not so much a matter of improving performance -
turning a client/server hop into server/server or server/cache should do
that - but of implementing that improvement in a clean way.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux