Re: regarding GF_CONTENT_KEY and dht2 - perf with small files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Problem is with workloads which know the files that need to be read
> without readdir, like hyperlinks (webserver), swift objects etc. These
> are two I know of which will have this problem, which can't be improved
> because we don't have metadata, data co-located. I have been trying to
> think of a solution for past few days. Nothing good is coming up :-/

In those cases, caching (at the MDS) would certainly help a lot.  Some
variation of the compounding infrastructure under development for Samba
etc. might also apply, since this really is a compound operation.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux