Re: NetBSD portability (was Re: NetBSD tests not running to completion)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I was in the middle of composing a reply along pretty much the same
> lines when I saw Jeff's reply land in my inbox.
> 
> We are migrating from gnfs to NFS-Ganesha for NFS; NFS-Ganesha uses
> GFAPI. If Samba isn't already using a GFAPI-based VFS, it will be soon.
> 
> FUSE isn't the best answer, IMO, to the "universal storage" question.

I thought FUSE was the only way to acheive automatic failover on server
failure. Am I wrong?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux