Re: Gluster testing matrix

[Deepak Shetty <dpkshetty@xxxxxxxxx>]

Where / How do you indicate whether the underlying GlusterFS is used/tested using fusemount or libgfapi method or both ?

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi All,

Here is a table representing the current state of Gluster testing.

* Things in green are categories for which we have some kind of testing in place.

* Things in red are the ones which don't have any tests.

* Things in yellow are the ones which have no known tests or are not managed by Gluster community.

Test Category/Sub-Category
smoke	source build + Posix complaince + Dbench
functional	tests/basic
regression	tests/bugs
performance regression	N/A
integration	Backends/FS	Protocols	Consumers/Cloud Environments	Tools	libgfapi bindings	OS environment
	xfs	smb	qemu	gdeploy	java	firewalld
	ext4	nfs	openstack/cinder	heketi	python	ufw
	btrfs	swift	openshift/docker/containers		ruby	selinux
	zfs		aws		go	apparmor
			azure
			hadoop
update	major version upgrades	minor version upgrades
longevity	a. memory leaks b. log accumulation
distro packaging	a. pkg build + smoke b. sysvinit/systemd

I will send separate mails for each of the categories above highlighting plans for them.

Use this thread to indicate addition/deletion/changes to this matrix.

We will put this at gluster.org website once it is final.

Thanks,

Raghavendra Talur & MSV Bhat

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel