Re: Gerrit and Bugzilla usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/28/2015 03:28 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> While preparing the list of bugs for 3.7.6 I observed some patches that
> had used bugs incorrectly.
> 
> Few things to keep in mind:
> 
> 1. If you use the gerrit backport feature, take care to add the bug
> number in topic section manually as it is not automatic. If not done, we
> lose updates on bugzilla because scripts are triggered based on bug
> number mentioned in topic.
> 
> 2. Please don't use umbrella/tracker bugs for sending patches. It may
> happen that not all bugs are fixed under a tracker bug within a release
> and it creates ambiguity of whether to include it in list of bugs fixed
> or not.
> 
> 3. Please don't use bugs which were closed as part of previous release.
This has been a pain for a release manager in past. IMO, along with the
patch owners I think maintainers also need to be extra cautious and
follow this checklist before merging the patches. A collaborative effort
from all of us can definitely wipe this issue off.

> 
> 
> Raghavendra Talur
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux