Re: NetBSD regression failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, it makes sense to move both geo-rep test to bad tests for now till.
the issue gets fixed in netBSD. I am looking into it netbsd failures.

Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Avra Sengupta" <asengupt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "gluster-infra"
> <gluster-infra@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Raghavendra Talur" <rtalur@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 11:02:08 AM
> Subject: Re:  NetBSD regression failures
> 
> On 08/18/2015 09:25 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > On 08/17/2015 02:20 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> >> That patch itself might not pass all regressions as it might fail at the
> >> geo-rep test. I have sent a patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11934/)
> >> with both the tests being moved to bad test. Talur could you please
> >> abandon 11933.
> > It seems like we need to move tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-tarssh.t as
> > well to the bad test?
> Yes looks like it. I will resend the patch with this change.
> >> Regards,
> >> Avra
> >>
> >> On 08/17/2015 02:12 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> >>> tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t has been already been added to bad test by
> >>> http://review.gluster.org/11933
> >>>
> >>> ~Atin
> >>>
> >>> On 08/17/2015 02:09 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> >>>> Will send a patch moving ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t and
> >>>> ./tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t to bad test.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Avra
> >>>>
> >>>> On 08/17/2015 12:45 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> >>>>> On 08/17/2015 12:29 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
> >>>>>> On Monday 17 August 2015 12:22 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The NetBSD regression tests are continuously failing with errors in
> >>>>>>> the following tests:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
> >>>>>>> ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t
> >>>>>> quota-anon-fd-nfs.t is known issues with NFS client caching so it is
> >>>>>> marked as bad test, final test will be marked as success even if this
> >>>>>> test fails.
> >>>>> Yes it seems "./tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t" also fails in
> >>>>> the runs where quota-anon-fd-nfs.t fails, and that marks the final
> >>>>> tests as failure.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Is there any recent change that is trigerring this behaviour. Also
> >>>>>>> currently one machine is running NetBSD tests. Can someone with
> >>>>>>> access to Jenkins, bring up a few more slaves to run NetBSD
> >>>>>>> regressions in parallel.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> Avra
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>>>>>> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>>>> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>>> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux