That patch itself might not pass all regressions as it might fail at the
geo-rep test. I have sent a patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11934/)
with both the tests being moved to bad test. Talur could you please
abandon 11933.
Regards,
Avra
On 08/17/2015 02:12 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t has been already been added to bad test by
http://review.gluster.org/11933
~Atin
On 08/17/2015 02:09 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Will send a patch moving ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t and
./tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t to bad test.
Regards,
Avra
On 08/17/2015 12:45 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
On 08/17/2015 12:29 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
On Monday 17 August 2015 12:22 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Hi,
The NetBSD regression tests are continuously failing with errors in
the following tests:
./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t
quota-anon-fd-nfs.t is known issues with NFS client caching so it is
marked as bad test, final test will be marked as success even if this
test fails.
Yes it seems "./tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t" also fails in
the runs where quota-anon-fd-nfs.t fails, and that marks the final
tests as failure.
Is there any recent change that is trigerring this behaviour. Also
currently one machine is running NetBSD tests. Can someone with
access to Jenkins, bring up a few more slaves to run NetBSD
regressions in parallel.
Regards,
Avra
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
