Re: reviving spurious failures tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 07/29/2015 06:56 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:


On 07/29/2015 06:10 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:06:43PM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote:
- If there are tests that cannot be fixed easily in the near term, we move
such tests to a different folder or drop such test units.
A tests/disabled directory seemsthe way to go. But before going there,
the test maintaniner should be notified. Perhaps we should have a list
of contacts ina comment on the topof each test?
Jeff already implemented bad-tests infra already. We can use the same?
Check is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh

tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t is failing very frequently on netbsd machines.
The latest failure is https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/9296/consoleFull

The test always passes when run in bash -x mode. It seems that timeout for test 51 and test 52 is 
sometimes not enough. Can any one from NFS team verify the same and increase the timeout if
required?

I will be moving the test to bad test list till this is fixed.




Pranith


Pranith


_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux