Re: reviving spurious failures tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 07/29/2015 06:10 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:06:43PM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote:
- If there are tests that cannot be fixed easily in the near term, we move
such tests to a different folder or drop such test units.
A tests/disabled directory seemsthe way to go. But before going there,
the test maintaniner should be notified. Perhaps we should have a list
of contacts ina comment on the topof each test?
Jeff already implemented bad-tests infra already. We can use the same?

Pranith


_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux