Re: release schedule for glusterfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/05/2015 07:01 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote:
Indeed , no feedback on QA releases happens between minor versions.
I do think , there is no point to keep alpha/beta releases between minor versions , but we can do that for Major as Kaleb mentioned.

--Humble


+1

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/05/2015 08:45 AM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> On 08/05/2015 05:57 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote:
>> Hi Ragavendra,
>>
>> How many beta releases hit for each minor release ? and the gap
>> between these releases ?
>>
>> --Humble
>>
>
> I am not sure about the beta releases. As per my understanding there are
> no beta releases happening in release-3.5 branch and also the latest
> release-3.7 branch. I was doing beta releases for release-3.6 branch.
> But I am also thinking of moving away from it and make 3.6.5 directly
> (and also future release-3.6 releases).

We get zero feedback from alphas and betas. Nobody has complained about
the lack of them.

IMO we should still to alpha and beta for x.y.0 releases though.

--

Kaleb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux