On Wednesday 05 August 2015 07:01 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote:
Indeed , no feedback on QA releases happens between minor versions. I do think , there is no point to keep alpha/beta releases between minor versions , but we can do that for Major as Kaleb mentioned.
+1 to this proposal. -Vijay
--Humble On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: On 08/05/2015 08:45 AM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote: > On 08/05/2015 05:57 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote: >> Hi Ragavendra, >> >> How many beta releases hit for each minor release ? and the gap >> between these releases ? >> >> --Humble >> > > I am not sure about the beta releases. As per my understanding there are > no beta releases happening in release-3.5 branch and also the latest > release-3.7 branch. I was doing beta releases for release-3.6 branch. > But I am also thinking of moving away from it and make 3.6.5 directly > (and also future release-3.6 releases). We get zero feedback from alphas and betas. Nobody has complained about the lack of them. IMO we should still to alpha and beta for x.y.0 releases though. -- Kaleb _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
