On 07/28/2015 04:31 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: >> IMO this is a different issue, not related to inline semantics. Anand >> has already posted a patch [1] to address it. >> >> [1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11757/ > > Thanks, Atin. Avoiding spurious failures in this test would be a good > thing. Do you have any information about when the underlying problem > in glusterd might get fixed? Glusterd 2.0 will definitely solve this kind of issues where n * n handshaking can cause race. For existing glusterD having volumes list URCU protected could solve it, but I don't see that's getting done in near future. > -- ~Atin _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
