Re: Modifying GlusterFS to cope with C99 inline semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> My opinion: don't try to second guess the compiler/optimizer; stop using
> inline. Full Stop.

To this end, I've submitted a patch which removes all instances in .c
files.

    http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11769/

For removing the ones in .h files, I propose that we create a new file
'xxx-inline.c' for each 'xxx.h' that uses inlines, and move the
de-inlined functions there.  It's not ideal and it still requires a bit
of manual work, but it should get us out of the inline swamp for now.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux