On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:45:50PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 06/29/2015 02:40 PM, Anoop C S wrote: > > > > > > On 06/29/2015 11:56 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > >> On 06/29/2015 02:04 PM, Anoop C S wrote: > >>> > >>> Reading through gcc docs I could see that with gcc v5, it > >>> defaults to C99 semantics and compiling with -fgnu89-inline > >>> solves the above issue. I'm wondering how glusterfs compiled > >>> successfully without providing this flag. > > > >> Well, it didn't originally. > > > >> Most of the bugs were fixed before Fedora 22 arrived with gcc-5. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > I didn't say all of them had been fixed. ;-) > > > > >> E.g. by building on Fedora Rawhide last year, reporting the bugs, > >> and getting them fixed before Rawhide turned into Fedora 22. > > > > > > Immediately after the Fedora 22 release, we had a similar issue > > reported from a user with gcc v5 and was fixed through [1]. > > > > Yes, there were still some, and/or some had crept (back) in, when > Fedora22 was released. > > I think we're still finding some more. Not all of the developers are > using Fedora 22 yet. I know a few that are still on Fedora 19! > > Niels and I had a brief chat a while back about adding a Fedora 22 VM to > Jenkins to catch these. I don't think anything ever happened though. I'm waiting for the new Jenkins slaves to become available... We should try to not exceed the Rackspace budget too much. Niels _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
