On 06/29/2015 02:04 PM, Anoop C S wrote: > > Reading through gcc docs I could see that with gcc v5, it defaults to > C99 semantics and compiling with -fgnu89-inline solves the above > issue. I'm wondering how glusterfs compiled successfully without > providing this flag. Well, it didn't originally. Most of the bugs were fixed before Fedora 22 arrived with gcc-5. E.g. by building on Fedora Rawhide last year, reporting the bugs, and getting them fixed before Rawhide turned into Fedora 22. > I'm investigating on other ways to use inline > that behave the same in the old and the new semantics. Using a command line option to get 1989 compiler semantics in 2015 seems like a mistake. -- Kaleb _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
