Avoid split-brains on replica-2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Using a replica-2 gluster volume with oVirt is currently not supported and causes split-brains, specially due to sanlock.

Replica-1 works fine (since split-brains are impossible here) and replica-3 *should* work or at least reduces the probability of suffering split-brains (depends on race-conditions?). Besides, geo-replication allows to replicate a replica-1 volume in order to achieve similar results as replica-2. But since geo-rep uses rsync I guess that it's less optimal than using "replica-n" where I guess blocks are marked as dirty to be replicated. Does geo-rep do the same?
How does replica-n and geo-rep compare in a continuous replication scenario?
How safe is it to use replica-n or geo-rep for VM images? Will the replicated VM images be mostly consistent compared to a bare-metal sudden power-off?

My guess is that replica-n is safer than geo-rep since it replicates writes synchronically in real-time, while geo-rep seems to do an initial scan using rsync, but I'm not sure how it continues replicating after that initial sync.

Anyway, I would like to ask, discuss or propose the following idea:
- Have an option to tell gluster to write to only one brick (split-brains would be impossible) which will then replicate to other bricks. - A local brick (if exists) should be selected as the "write authority brick".

This would increase the global write performance which is currently constrained to the slowest node because writes are currently replicated synchronically to all other replicas (=> writes are not scalable for replica volumes).

Basically, the idea here is to have an option to avoid split-brains selecting an authority brick and to avoid sync writes. The same goal could be achieved by forcing gluster to resolve *all* split-brains by choosing the authority brick as the winner (?).

Do we currently have an option for doing something like this?

Benefits for gluster:
- replica-n won't cause no split-brains
- scalability (write performance won't be limited to the slowed node)

Best regards,
Christopher Pereira

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux