Re: regressions on release-3.7 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/21/2015 01:00 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
Another option would be to maintain a file with this list in the tests
directory. run-tests.sh can lookup this file to determine whether it
should continue or bail out.

Alternatively^2, I could modify http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10277/ to
run such tests and ignore the results instead of skipping them entirely.
What tests should be on the list?


All tests in the "Needing investigation" and "Being investigated" categories of spurious-failures etherpad [1] could be a good start.

-Vijay

[1] https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures


_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux