> Are you meaning deleting the tests temporarily (to let other stuff > pass without being held up by it), or permanently? Kind of both. I think the tests should be deleted so they don't interfere with other work, but that means we'll have features without tests. Lack of a test should be considered a release blocker just as surely as lack of the feature itself. Therefore, either fixing the old tests or developing new ones should be a very high priority. > That makes sense to me... as long as any temporarily-deleted-tests > have their root cause(s) found and fixed before we release 3.7. :) Exactly. We can't release until we can test. Whether we can't test because the tests are broken or because the tests are absent, the result is the same. New/fixed tests should be required before we can release. _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
