> Portable is one thing, the availability and its maintenance burdon in > distributions an other. I do not think Fedora has any plans on including > LibreSSL and LibTLS in the near future. There even was an attempt to > only use GnuTLS (?) or OpenSSL because two implementations of such a > complex library is perceived as inefficient. I think it was NSS, which AFAICT has the hairiest and worst-documented API of the whole lot. :( Of the readily-available options, PolarSSL is the only one that seems even possibly worth the effort, but even that will probably never happen as long as there are so many other fish to fry. _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
