On 19 Mar 2015, at 22:36, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 09:13:03PM +0000, Justin Clift wrote: >> Hi Jeff, >> >> Is LibTLS (by the OpenBSD LibreSSL people) on your radar? >> >> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9233065 >> http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20141101063214&pid=3 >> >> Their main LibreSSL website says it's portable - eg to Linux, >> FreeBSD, etc - so it kind of sounds interesting. ;) > > Portable is one thing, the availability and its maintenance burdon in > distributions an other. I do not think Fedora has any plans on including > LibreSSL and LibTLS in the near future. There even was an attempt to > only use GnuTLS (?) or OpenSSL because two implementations of such a > complex library is perceived as inefficient. > > I'd prefer to stick to the mainstream libraries, at least for now. No worries. Was just a thought. :) + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
