On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:45:41PM +0530, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: > On 02/19/2015 02:30 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > >Hey Pranith! > > > >Thanks for putting this topic on my radar. Uncommunicated packaging > >changes have indeed been a pain for non-RPM distributions on several > >occasions. We should try to inform other packagers about required > >changes in the packaging scripts or upgrade/installation process better. > > +1 > >On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:26:33PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113778 > >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191176 > >> > >>How can we make the process of giving good packages for things other than > >>RPMs? > >My guess is that we need to announce packaging changes very clearly. > >Maybe it makes sense to have a very low-traffic packaging@xxxxxxxxxxx > >mailinglist where all packagers from all distributions are subscribed? > > +1 for announce packaging changes very clearly. > > But I think we should keep using gluster-devel ML for packaging discussions > as IMO it is the right platform to get all developers and packagers > together. However We need to discuss these stuff clearly which we lacked > before. My idea was to reduce the number of emails that packagers receive. Not all packagers are active as a Gluster developer, and the -devel list has quite some traffic. I am afraid that important changes would get lost in the noise. Niels > > Thanks, > Lala > >I've added all packagers that I could track on CC, and am interested in > >their preferences and ideas. > > > >Thanks, > >Niels > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
