Hey Pranith! Thanks for putting this topic on my radar. Uncommunicated packaging changes have indeed been a pain for non-RPM distributions on several occasions. We should try to inform other packagers about required changes in the packaging scripts or upgrade/installation process better. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:26:33PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113778 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191176 > > How can we make the process of giving good packages for things other than > RPMs? My guess is that we need to announce packaging changes very clearly. Maybe it makes sense to have a very low-traffic packaging@xxxxxxxxxxx mailinglist where all packagers from all distributions are subscribed? I've added all packagers that I could track on CC, and am interested in their preferences and ideas. Thanks, Niels
Attachment:
pgpLAvb9krePr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
