Hi Neils,
>My guess is that we need to announce packaging changes very clearly.
Maybe it makes sense to have a very low-traffic packaging@xxxxxxxxxxx
mailinglist where all packagers from all distributions are subscribed?
>
--Humble
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey Pranith!
Thanks for putting this topic on my radar. Uncommunicated packaging
changes have indeed been a pain for non-RPM distributions on several
occasions. We should try to inform other packagers about required
changes in the packaging scripts or upgrade/installation process better.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:26:33PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113778
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191176
>
> How can we make the process of giving good packages for things other than
> RPMs?
My guess is that we need to announce packaging changes very clearly.
Maybe it makes sense to have a very low-traffic packaging@xxxxxxxxxxx
mailinglist where all packagers from all distributions are subscribed?
I've added all packagers that I could track on CC, and am interested in
their preferences and ideas.
Thanks,
Niels
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
