> This is right on some systems, but not universal. This is why libtool > links afr.so while warning it is not portable. You can have a hint > that modules may not be plain libraries here: > $ libtool link --help|grep module > -module build a library that can dlopened So you're using "DSO" to mean not just something that's a dynamic shared object but specifically something that's built to work with dlopen? Seems like bad terminology to me, and possibly bad engineering, but when libtool is involved that's not a surprise. Back to the point, it seems like we should use "ld -l" for some things (e.g. libglusterfs) and dlopen for others (e.x. xlators), but never "cross the streams" or just add a .so to the list of objects. Does that sound right? _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
