Re: glfsheal test failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:18:01AM -0500, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, yes.  Those end up in /lib64 where they are found
> > without any special configuration on our part.  Translators are different;
> > we
> > install those in a different location that the system doesn't already know
> > about.
> 
> That is not the only problem: DSO and libraries are not linked the same way.

What distinction is important here?  In my experience - not just on Linux - a
shared library *is* a dynamic shared object unless one specifically links
statically, so the difference isn't the thing itself.  Are you saying there's
a difference in how the thing is specified on the linker command line (e.g.
"-lafr" vs. "afr.so")?  If using "-l" even for libraries in known locations
is a problem, why hasn't this issue come up e.g. for libglusterfs?
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux