Re: NetBSD regression tests: reviews required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:55:07 +0100
manu@xxxxxxxxxx (Emmanuel Dreyfus) wrote:
<snip>
> Some news on triggered NetBSD regression tests: we still have a few
> test that always fail in basic. I tweaked the regression test
> launching script to skip them, so that we can come some useful
> results until they are fixed. But before enabling votes, we still
> need to merge two change sets to fix spurious failures:
> http://review.gluster.com/9071
> http://review.gluster.com/9075
> 
<snip> 
> And while I am there, it would be nice if someone could review this
> one: http://review.gluster.com/9137

Hi all,

Does anyone have time to look over some (or all) of these three for
correctness?

We're trying to get the NetBSD side of things running 100%, and
waiting on these is blocking us. ;)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

-- 
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux