Krishnan Parthasarathi <kparthas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for testing the suggestion. Would you be sending a patch > using synclock_t? Well, I suspect you will produce it much faster than I, hence I'd prefer if you could send it. I can test it, though. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
